Speech act theory a historical development
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Speech act theory, from the perspective of pragmatics, is a concept that is continually developing within the realm of linguistics. While Austin and Searle’s models provided the conceptual frameworks that contribute to ongoing scholarship, contemporary research also identifies a need for further adapting established models as analysts examine issues impacting subjects, organizations, and nations in the 21st century. In this context, the primary objective of this article is to offer an overview of the historical evolution of Speech Act Theory and to illustrate how these theoretical evaluations enhance the dissertation's examination of speech acts as processes that impact distinct populations in diverse manners.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abdulabbas, I. A. 2022. “The Pragmatic Aspects of Speech Acts”. Elementary Education Online, 21(3), pp. 165-165. https://doi.org/ 10.17051/ilkonline.2022.03.11
Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2015). “Framing theory in communication research in Spain. Origins, development and current situation”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 70, pp. 423-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1053
Ariel, M. 2010. Defining pragmatics. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Austin, J. L. 1990. A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 57 (1956 - 1957), pp. 1-30. Oxford University Press.
Austin, J. L. 2020. How to Do Things with Words. Barakaldo Books. https://www.kobo.com/ww/en/ebook/how-to-do-things-with-words?srsltid=AfmBOoru0SVW1rGHEsVvyT3w5Q94iKlH9GsD5JijJ8AxCgoCa-R3o-9j
Austin, J.L. 1976. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Azhari, A. S., Priono, P., & Nuriadi, N. 2018. “Speech Acts of Classroom Interaction”. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Culture (IJLLC), 4(2), pp.24-45. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/281208-speech-acts-of-classroom-interaction-a2be163a.pdf
Bach, K. 1995. Standardization vs. Conventionalization. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 677-686.
Bach, K. And Harnish, R. M. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Bach, K. and Harnish, R. M. 1992. How Performatives Really Work: A Reply to Searle. Linguistics and Philosophy, pp.15, 93-110.
Bednarek, M. 2006a. Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum, pp. 5-30.
Bednarek, M. 2006b. Evaluating Europe – Parameters of Evaluation in the British Press, In C. Leung And J. Jenkins (Eds.) Reconfiguring Europe – The Contribution of Applied Linguistics. London: BAAL/Equinox (British Studies In Applied Linguistics), pp. 137–156.
Bloor, M. & Bloor, T. 2014. “Critical Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics of Discourse”. Handbook 0f Pragmatics. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin. 189. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-008
Borchmann, S. 2020. “The Intentionality of Questions–A Critique of Searle's Analysis of Speech Acts”. Scandinavian Studies in Language, 11(1), Pp.20-55. Https://Doi.Org/10.7146/Sss.V11i1.121360
Caroline, R. T., Sitorus, U., Sinurat, B., & Silalahi, D. E. 2021. “An Analysis on the Speech Act of Mark Zuckerberg In English Speeches Youtube Channel”. Zien Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanities, 1(1), pp.175-181. Https://Zienjournals.Com/Index.Php/Zjssh/Article/View/113
Cheng, M. 2002. “The Standoff: What Is Unsaid? A Pragmatic Analysis of the Conditional Marker ‘if’”. Discourse & Society, 13(3), 309-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926502013003050
Dada, S. A. 2004. “Introduction to Pragmatics”. In T. Bamisaye Ed. An Integrated Study in Language and Society Pp.141-166. Lagos: Majab Publishers.
Devi, M. F., & Degaf, A. 2021. "An Analysis of Commissive Speech Act Used by the Main Character of" Knives Out". PARADIGM: Journal of Language And Literary Studies, 4(1),Pp. 43-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/prdg.v4i1.10932
Dolan, C., Huang, J., & Gordon, C. 2021. “The Ambiguity of Mutuality: Discourse and Power in Corporate Value Regimes”. Dialectical Anthropology, pp.45, 9-27. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10624-019-09569-y
Drid, T. 2018. Language as Action: Fundamentals of the Speech Act Theory. Praxis International Journal of Social Science and Literature, 1(10), 9.
Ekoro, D. E., & Gunn, M. 2021. “Speech Act Theory And Gricean Pragmatics: A Review”. Lwati: A Journal Of Contemporary Research, 18(4),pp. 130-143. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Franco, P. L. 2019. “Speech Act Theory and the Multiple Aims of Science”. Philosophy 0f Science, 86(5), pp.1005-1015. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy-of-science/article/abs/speech-act-theory-and-the-multiple-aims-of-science/A6A3FC56CF9BFD0E963AC35C9806AF7F
Gasparatou, R. (2018). “How to Do Things With Words: Speech Acts in Education”. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(5), Pp.510-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1382353
Gowasa, N. S., Radiana, S. P., & Afifah, N. 2019. “A Study on The Use of Speech Acts: A Review of Selected Paper”. ELSYA: Journal of English Language Studies, 1(2), pp.55-60. Https://Doi.Org/10.31849/Elsya.V1i2.3528
Hadiati, C. 2019. “Felicity Conditions of The Speech Acts In Banyumasan Daily Conversation”. Theory And Practice in Language Studies, 9(6), pp.700-705. I: Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.17507/Tpls.0906.13
Harris, D. W., & Unnsteinsson, E. 2018. “Wittgenstein’s Influence on Austin’s Philosophy of Language”. British Journal for The History of Philosophy, 26(2), pp.371-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2017.1396958
Harris, D. W., Fogal, D., & Moss, M. 2018. “Speech Acts: The Contemporary Theoretical Landscape”. Oxford University Press, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198738831.001.0001
Hogg, M. A. 2001. “A Social Identity of Theory 0f Leadership”. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200. Https://10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1
Hosseinpour, G. 2021. “A Meditation on Austin and Searle Taxonomies of Illocutionary Acts”. Philosophy, 19(2), 39-56. Https://Doi.Org/ 10.22059/Jop.2021.321807.1006599
John, P., Brooks, B., & Schriever, U. 2019. “Speech Acts in Professional Maritime Discourse: A Pragmatic Risk Analysis of Bridge Team Communication Directives and Commissives in Full-Mission Simulation”. Journal of Pragmatics, pp.140, 12-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.013
Kamarudin, K. 2020. “Speech Acts Analysis and Its Application within the Interlocutors’ Communication”. Cordova Journal Language and Culture Studies, 10(1), Pp.67-83. Https://Doi.Org/10.20414/Cordova.V10i1.2228
Kanno-Youngs, Z. and Sullivan, E. 2022. “Is That Legal? How Scores of Migrants Came to Be Shipped North”. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/16/us/politics/migrants-marthas-vineyard-desantis.html
Labinaz, P., & Sbisà, M. 2021. “Speech Acts and The Dissemination of Knowledge in Social Networks”. Approaches to Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, 318, pp.145-172. Https://Www.Torrossa.Com/En/Resources/An/5001712#Page=154
Laengkang, A. G. 2018. “Analisis Lakuan Bahasa Terhadap Khutbah Jumaat Negeri Selangor”. Jurnal Hal Ehwal Islam Dan Warisan Selangor, pp.1-18.
Mabaquiao, N. M. 2018. Speech Act Theory: From Austin to Searle. Augustinian Journal, 19(1), pp.1-18.
Masykur, A. D. 2022. The Analysis on Illocution Functions for Imperative Utterances in “Uncle’s Tom Cabin” Novel. International Journal of English Linguistics, Literature, and Education (IJELLE). 1 Vol. 4, No., pp. 1-12 ISSN 2686-0120 (print), 2686-5106. http://journal.univetbantara.ac.id/index.php/ijelle/index.
Meibauer, J. 2019. “What is an Indirect Speech act? Reconsidering the Literal Force Hypothesis”. Pragmatics & Cognition, 26(1), pp.61-84. Https://Www.Jbe-Platform.Com/Content/Journals/10.1075/Pc.19009.Mei
Mukhroji, M., Nurkamto, J., Subroto, H. E., & Tardjana, S. S. 2019. “Pragmatic Forces in the Speech Acts of Efl Speakers At Kampung Inggris”, Indonesia. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(1), pp.38-60. https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/400
Neufeld, D. 2021. Reconceiving Texts as Speech Acts: An Analysis of I John (Vol. 7). Leiden, Holland: Brill.
Oishi, E. 2006. Austin’s Speech Act Theory and the Speech Situation. Esercizi Filosofici, 1.2006, pp.1-14. https://sites.units.it/eserfilo/art106/oishi106.pdf
Pedersen, H. M. 2002. Speech Acts And Agents - A Semantic Analysis. M.A Dissertation. Technical University of Denmark
Prihodko, G. 2018. “Specific Nature of Evaluative Speech Acts”. Advanced Education, 9, pp.201-205. Https://Doi.Org/10.20535/2410-8286.128232
Rühlemann, C., & Clancy, B. 2018. Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics. Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, pp.241-266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.11ruh
Sakai, T. 2019. “Between Performatives and Constatives: Construal in Speech Acts”. Tokyo University Linguistic Papers, 41, pp.259-277.
Sameer, I. H. 2021. “Speech Acts and Politeness in Nixon And Bush's Victory Speech: A Pragmatic Study”. Al-Adab Journal, 2138, pp.13-32. Https://Doi.Org/10.31973/Aj.V2i138.1738
Sarfi, F., Ghotbi, S., & Davoodi, M. F. 2018. “A Study of Speech Acts in Ghadir Hadith Based on Austin and Searle Theory”. Emamat Pajouhi, 8-2, pp.105-142. Https://Doi.Org/ 10.22034/Jep.2018.91176
Sbisa, M. 2013. Pragmatics of Speech Actions. in Sbisa, M.. & Turner, K. Eds. Handbook of Pragmatics, pp.25-74. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214383
Sbisa, M. And Turner, K. Eds. 2013. Pragmatics of Speech Actions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Searle, J. R. 1968. Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts. The Philosophical Review, 77-4, pp.405-424. https://doi.org/10.2307/2183008
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press: New York.
Searle, J. R. 1976. A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society, 5(1), pp.1-23. Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/4166848
Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in The Philosophy of Mind. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. 1989. How Performatives Work. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 535-558.
Sholihatin, E. 2020. “An Analysis of Illocutionary and Perlocutionary Speech Act in Defamation Texts”. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 7-1, 49-56. Https://E-Journal.Undikma.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jollt/Article/View/1438
Smith, B. 2003. John Searle: from Speech Acts to Social Reality. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Sobirova, N. E. 2022. “A Study on The Use of Speech Acts”. Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies, pp.18. http://dx.doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v18i.667
Stevani, M., Tarigan, K. E., Sawalmeh, M. H., & Ginting, F. Y. A. 2023. “A Case Study of Locutionary, Illocutionary, and Perlocutionary Speech Acts in English Learning Interactions in Junior High School”. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 5-1, pp.47-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2022.5.1.5
Tajfel, H. 1982. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Tarish, A. H. 2019. US Presidents’ Discourse. A Linguistic Approach. Phd Diss. West University of Timisoara.
Tashakori, M., & Gobanchi, N. 2022. “Study and Analysis Attar’s Mantegh-O-Teyr Speech Acts in Advancing Narration with Emphasis on John R Searle’s Theory”. Journal of Poetry Studies, 14-3, pp.93-120. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2507032/study-and-analysis-attar-s-mantegh-o-teyr-speech-acts-in-advancing-narration-with-emphasis-on-john-r-searle-s-theory?lang=en
Weisser, M. 2020. “Speech Acts in Corpus Pragmatics: Making The Case for An Extended Taxonomy”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 25-4, pp.400-425. Https://Doi.Org/10.1075/Ijcl.19023.Wei.
Zou, L., & Yiye, Z. 2022. “Review of Research on Development of Speech Act Theory and Its Application”. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 5-12, pp.127-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.12.16