Performance Analysis of Road and Bridge Planning Consultants in Highway Work in Banjarbakula
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The results of planning often find errors in road handling methods and volume inaccuracies between planning and field conditions. This study aims to analyze the performance of planning consultants on indicators of planning documents, indicators of planning performance, and indicators of understanding of planning references. To determine the level of performance satisfaction used CSI method. As for knowing the performance that must be improved or less satisfactory, the IPA method is used.
From the research results obtained based on the CSI method, Planning Document Indicators got 61.51% (Quite Satisfied), Planning Performance Indicators got 70.01% (Satisfied), and Indicators of Understanding of Planning References got 62.63% (Quite Satisfied). This study succeeded in identifying five factors that affect the performance of the planning consultant and need to be improved, namely 1) Conformity between the drawing documents, RKS, and Engineer Estimate, 2) The suitability of the type of personnel costs with project needs, 3) The suitability of the types of non-personnel costs with project needs, 4) Accuracy of data collection, and 5) The suitability of the method of calculating personnel costs with planning guidelines.
The first strategy of the consultant is to commit to using competent personnel according to the qualifications listed. The second strategy of the consultant is to review the planned site carefully. Moreover, the last strategy is for consultants to work more optimally and effectively in construction projects.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Asiyanto, 2005, Construction Project Cost Management, edisi dua, Penerbit Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.
Barry, Cushway. 2002. Human Resource Management. Jakarta. PT Elex Media Kumputindo Dipohusodo, Istimawan, 2006. Manajemen Proyek dan Konstruksi. Kanisius. Yogyakarta Ervianto. Wulfram I. 2009. Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi. Jakarta: Penerbit Graha Ilmu.
Basri¸ A. F. M., dan Rivai¸ V. 2005. Performance appraisal. Jakarta: PT Raja. Grafindo Persada.
Ervianto, I.W. 2005. Manajemen Proyek Konstruksi Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta. Andi.
Kerthajaya, I. K. 2014. “Evaluasi Pengendalian Waktu Dan Biaya Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Kost Dua Lantai Di Keputih Tegal Timur Surabaya”, Extrapolasi Jurnal Teknik Sipil Untag Surabaya, Vol. 7 No. 1, hal. 53-62.
Mohammad Arifin. 2018 “Analisis Pengaruh Kinerja Konsultan Supervisi Terhadap KinerjaProyek Paket Pekerjaan Relokasi Jalan Tol (Paket Jalan Tol Surabaya-Gempol Porong-Kejapanan)” Tim Penerbit Fakultas Teknik Untag Surabaya.
Prodonli. 2018 Analisis Faktor Untuk Menilai Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Dari Aspek Biaya, Mutu Dan Waktu Pada Proyek Jalan Dan Jembatan Di Kabupaten Murung Raya Provinsi kalimantan Tengah Tim Penerbit Fakultas Teknik Untag Surabaya.
Setiawan, B., dan Febryanto. 2018.”Analisis Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Pada Proyek GedungPemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Kampar”. Jurnal Teknik Industri Terintegrasi (JUTIN).1. (2).
Tomigolung, F., Sumajouw, M, D, J., dan Tarore, H. 2013. “Analisis Kinerja Konsultan Pengawas Pada Proyek Jalan Dan Jembatan Di Sulawesi Utara”. Jurnal Ilmiah MEDIA ENGINEERING. 3. (2).