A Comparative Evaluation of the Performance of SDN Controllers (ONOS) using DOCKER Container
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
software-defined networks SDN represents a significant shift in the networking field through the ability to solve problems facing traditional networks, such as updating components for networks and integration between devices. Open-source components and protocols were used in SDN. Among its advantages are the separation of the control plane from the data plane, the use of the OpenFlow protocol, and the transition to Decentralization in network management. In SDN, there are several types of controllers. In this paper, work has been done on ONOS controllers in cluster mode from one to five controllers, and a comparison between the performance of different numbers of controllers to obtain the best performance through the use of Cbench. It was found that using one or two controllers achieves the best performance
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
A. Nayyar, B. Singla, And, and P. Nagrath, Software Defined Networks. Scrivener Publishing, 2022.
A. Nguyen-Ngoc, S. Raffeck, S. Lange, S. Geissler, T. Zinner, and P. Tran-Gia, “Benchmarking the ONOS controller with OFCProbe,” in 2018 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Communications and Electronics (ICCE), 2018, pp. 367–372.
R. F. Babiceanu and R. Seker, “Manufacturing cyber-physical systems enabled by complex event processing and big data environments: a framework for development,” in Service Orientation in Holonic and Multi-agent Manufacturing, Springer, 2015, pp. 165–173.
K. Nam and K. Kim, “A Study on SDN security enhancement using open source IDS/IPS Suricata,” 9th Int. Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Converg. ICT Converg. Powered by Smart Intell. ICTC 2018, pp. 1124–1126, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ICTC.2018.8539455.
N. Gupta, M. S. Maashi, S. Tanwar, S. Badotra, M. Aljebreen, and S. Bharany, “A Comparative Study of Software Defined Networking Controllers Using Mininet,” 2022.
“https://wiki.onosproject.org/”.
M. U. Haque, L. H. Iwaya, and M. A. Babar, “Challenges in docker development: A large-scale study using stack overflow,” in Proceedings of the 14th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), 2020, pp. 1–11.
A. M. Potdar, D. G. Narayan, S. Kengond, and M. M. Mulla, “Performance evaluation of docker container and virtual machine,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 171, pp. 1419–1428, 2020.
P. Raj, J. S. Chelladhurai, and V. Singh, Learning Docker. Packt Publishing Ltd, 2015.
D. Gedia and L. Perigo, “Performance Evaluation of SDN-VNF in Virtual Machine and Container,” 2018 IEEE Conf. Netw. Funct. Virtualization Softw. Defin. Networks, NFV-SDN 2018, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.1109/NFV-SDN.2018.8725805.
S. Kwon and J.-H. Lee, “Divds: Docker image vulnerability diagnostic system,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 42666–42673, 2020.
A. T. Albu-Salih, “Performance Evaluation of Ryu Controller in Software Defined Networks,” J. Al-Qadisiyah Comput. Sci. Math., vol. 14, no. 1, p. Page-1, 2022.
A. Haggag, S. Awad, and A. S. Gaballah, “Controllers Performance Analysis in Software-Defined Networking,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng. Vol, vol. 10, no. 3, 2022.
O. Adeniyi, D. Chauhan, U. Ezidonye, M. Ayeni, and V. Patel, “Software-defined networking security,” 2021.