Impact of Nanoparticles on Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Pathways in Human Prostate Cancer
Main Article Content
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers among men and is fueled by oxidative stress and inflammation that drive tumor progression and resistance to therapy. Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and pro-inflammatory cytokine such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) establish a pro-tumor microenvironment. Iron oxide nanoparticles are believed to be promising micro/nano therapy agents because NPs such as ferric oxide (Fe2O3) play a critical role in antioxidant and anti-inflammatory events. Herein, we examine influences of NPs on oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways in prostate cancer models. NP treatment was used for cells exposed to oxidative and inflammatory stressors. We measured a variety of key markers including ROS, MDA, GSH, and activities of antioxidant enzymes (catalase [CAT] and superoxide dismutase [SOD]). The levels of inflammatory cytokines were determined by widely used biochemical methods and spectrophotomedically. This resulted in significant reduction in ROS and MDA (oxidative damage markers) and significant elevation in the reduced GSH levels and these results were supported by the increased levels of antioxidant enzymes namely catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in NP-treated. Moreover, NPs also inhibited inflammation by downregulating the release of cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6. These effects suggest that NPs are capable of restoring oxidative homeostasis and suppressing inflammation, ultimately leading to a more tumor-hostile microenvironment. Abstract Nanoparticles that alleviate oxidative stress and overwrite inflammation pathways synergistically offer two critical blockade points in prostate cancer therapy to counter plasma phase-induced cellular malfunctions required for tumor progression. These results reinforce the prospect of NP as complements to cancer therapy. Optimizing NP formulations could improve their efficacy and safety for potential clinical applications in the future and provide new approaches for improving prostate cancer treatment. CuO NPs with Anti-cancer Effect on Prostate Cancer: In Vivo Study Oxidative Stress along with Inflammation as Potential Pathogenesis Prostate Cancer Responsive Ferric Oxide Nanoparticles Release ROS Assist in Treating Prostate Cancer.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(3):211–33.
Klaunig JE. Oxidative stress and cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(40):4771–8.
Liou GY, Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res. 2010;44(5):479–96.
Shacter E, Weitzman SA. Chronic inflammation and cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2002;16(2):217–26.
Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357(9255):539–45.
Pelicano H, Carney D, Huang P. ROS stress in cancer cells and therapeutic implications. Drug Resist Updat. 2004;7(2):97–110.
Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74.
Mohler JL, Antonarakis ES. NCCN guidelines updates: Management of prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(5.5):583–6.
Singh R, Lillard JW Jr. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Exp Mol Pathol. 2009;86(3):215–23.
Zhang L, Gu FX, Chan JM, Wang AZ, Langer RS, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticles in medicine: Therapeutic applications and developments. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;83(5):761–9.
Akhtar MJ, Ahamed M, Kumar S, Khan MM, Ahmad J, Alrokayan SA. Zinc oxide nanoparticles selectively induce apoptosis in human cancer cells through reactive oxygen species. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:845–57.
Mukherjee S, Chowdhury D, Kotcherlakota R, Patra S. Potential theranostics application of bio-synthesized silver nanoparticles (4-in-1 system). Theranostics. 2014;4(3):316–35.
Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications, and toxicities. Arab J Chem. 2019;12(7):908–31.
Yin PT, Shah S, Pasquale NJ, Garbuzenko OB, Minko T, Lee KB. Stem cell-based gene therapy activated using magnetic hyperthermia to enhance the treatment of cancer. Biomaterials. 2016;81:46–57.
Alexis F, Rhee JW, Richie JP, Radovic-Moreno AF, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. New frontiers in nanotechnology for cancer treatment. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;61(5):715–20.
Nie S, Xing Y, Kim GJ, Simons JW. Nanotechnology applications in cancer. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:257–88.
Awasthi R, Roseblade A, Hansbro PM, Rathbone MJ, Dua K, Bebawy M. Nanoparticles in cancer treatment: Opportunities and obstacles. Curr Drug Targets. 2018;19(2):169–80.
Klaunig JE. Oxidative stress and cancer. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(40):4771–8.
Liou GY, Storz P. Reactive oxygen species in cancer. Free Radic Res. 2010;44(5):479–96.
Bhattacharyya A, Chattopadhyay R, Mitra S, Crowe SE. Oxidative stress: an essential factor in the pathogenesis of gastrointestinal mucosal diseases. Physiol Rev. 2014;94(2):329–54.
Mukherjee S, Chowdhury D, Kotcherlakota R, Patra S. Potential theranostics application of bio-synthesized silver nanoparticles (4-in-1 system). Theranostics. 2014;4(3):316–35.
Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: Back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357(9255):539–45.
Shacter E, Weitzman SA. Chronic inflammation and cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2002;16(2):217–26.
Akhtar MJ, Ahamed M, Kumar S, Khan MM, Ahmad J, Alrokayan SA. Zinc oxide nanoparticles selectively induce apoptosis in human cancer cells through reactive oxygen species. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:845–57.
Yin PT, Shah S, Pasquale NJ, Garbuzenko OB, Minko T, Lee KB. Stem cell-based gene therapy activated using magnetic hyperthermia to enhance the treatment of cancer. Biomaterials. 2016;81:46–57.