From Education to Food Security: A Capability-Based Perspective on Household Well-being in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study investigates the role of household head education in reducing the likelihood of moderate or severe food insecurity in Indonesia, drawing on Sen’s Capability Approach. Rather than treating education as a proxy for income, it is conceptualized as a foundational capability that enhances agency, access to information, and household resilience. Using nationally representative data from the Indonesian National Socioeconomic Survey (SUSENAS, 2019–2023), the study employs multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression to assess how education interacts with district-level Human Development Index (HDI) and poverty rates in shaping food security outcomes.
Results confirm that higher educational attainment significantly lowers the odds of food insecurity. However, this protective effect varies by context. Education is most effective in lower-HDI districts, where institutional supports are weaker and individual agency becomes critical. In contrast, its impact diminishes in high-HDI urban areas, where high living costs and structural inequality constrain capability realization. Similarly, in high-poverty districts, the benefits of education are reduced by limited opportunities to convert educational capital into tangible well-being. A three-way interaction shows the greatest constraint where development and deprivation coexist.
These findings highlight the need for context-sensitive policies combining educational investment with structural reforms to ensure meaningful expansion of capability and food security.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[1] Y. YAHMAN, A. SETYAGAMA: Government policy in regulating the environment for development of sustainable environment in Indonesia. Environ. Dev. Sustain., ISSN 1387-585X, 25, 12829–12840 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02591-1
[2] Z. WENDLING, J. W. EMERSON, A. DE SHERBININ, D. C. ESTY: Environmental Performance Index 2020. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New Haven, CT (2020).
[3] S. BLOCK, J. W. EMERSON, D. C. ESTY, A. DE SHERBININ, Z. A. WENDLING, K. KURCZYNSKI, F. LIN, C. XU, N. WU, J. HARWOOD, E. OLIVA, S. CHEUNG, A. DESAI: Environmental Performance Index 2024. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New Haven, CT (2024).
[4] P. C. STERN: New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J. Soc. Issues, ISSN 0022-4537, 56 (3), 407–424 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
[5] A. KOLLMUSS, J. AGYEMAN: Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res., ISSN 1350-4622, 8 (3), 239–260 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
[6] M. SOGA, K. J. GASTON: Do people who experience more nature act more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Biol. Conserv., ISSN 0006-3207, 289, 110417 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110417
[7] S. J. ZAWADZKI, L. STEG, T. BOUMAN: Meta-analytic evidence for a robust and positive association between individuals’ pro-environmental behaviors and their subjective wellbeing. Environ. Res. Lett., ISSN 1748-9326, 15 (12), 123007 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc4ae
[8] M. BERGQUIST, A. NILSSON, W. P. SCHULTZ: A meta-analysis of field experiments using social norms to promote pro-environmental behaviors. Glob. Environ. Change, ISSN 0959-3780, 59, 101941 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101941
[9] A. DARYANTO, Z. SONG: A meta-analysis of the relationship between place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour. J. Bus. Res., ISSN 0148-2963, 123, 208–219 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.045
[10] S. BAMBERG, G. MÖSER: Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J. Environ. Psychol., ISSN 0272-4944, 27 (1), 14–25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
[11] GARAIKA, D. SUGANDINI: Knowledge, self-image, and attitude on pro-environmental behavior: An empirical study in Indonesia. J. Asian Finance Econ. Bus., ISSN 2288-4637, 8 (6), 869–877 (2021). https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no6.0869
[12] W. S. PURBA, D. KUSUMAWARDANI: Pro-environmental behavior and social capital in Indonesia 2021: A micro data analysis. Int. J. Sustainable Dev. Plann., ISSN 1743-7601, 18 (7), 2107–2119 (2023). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180713
[13] M. RAHSILAPUTERI, U. SUMARWAN, HARTOYO, B. SUHARJO: The role of media, life experience, knowledge and government support in creating Generation Z’s pro-environmental behavior in Indonesia. Sustinere: Journal of Environment and Sustainability, ISSN 2549-6061, 6 (2), 132–156 (2022). https://doi.org/10.22515/sustinere.jes.v6i2.143
[14] D. I. WIJAYA, P. KOKCHANG: Factors influencing Generation Z’s pro-environmental behavior towards Indonesia’s energy transition. Sustainability, ISSN 2071-1050, 15 (18), 13485 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813485
[15] S. FEBRIANSYAH, M. A. TAIBE, N. NURHIKMAH: Pengaruh environmental identity dan religiosity terhadap pro-environmental behavior (PEB) pada masyarakat Indonesia [The effect of environmental identity and religiosity on pro-environmental behavior (PEB) in Indonesian society]. Jurnal Psikologi Karakter, ISSN 2798-1651, 3 (2), 327–335 (2023). https://doi.org/10.56326/jpk.v3i2.2492
[16] BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik): Indeks Kebahagiaan 2021 [Happiness Index 2021]. BPS, Jakarta, Indonesia (2021).
[17] BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik): Indeks Perilaku Ketidakpedulian Lingkungan Hidup Indonesia 2018 [2018 Indonesian Environmental Indifference Behavior Index Report]. BPS, Jakarta, Indonesia (2018).
[18] S. RABE-HESKETH, A. SKRONDAL: Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. Stata Press, College Station, Texas (2022).
[19] J. URBAN, M. BRAUN KOHLOVÁ: The COVID-19 crisis does not diminish environmental motivation: Evidence from two panel studies of decision making and self-reported pro-environmental behavior. J. Environ. Psychol., ISSN 0272-4944, 80, 101761 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101761
[20] A. FRANZEN, R. MEYER: Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. Eur. Soc. Rev., ISSN 0953-7578, 26 (2), 219–234 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp
[21] H. H. HASAN, S. F. M. RAZALI, N. H. M. RAZALI: Does the household save water? Evidence from behavioral analysis. Sustainability, ISSN 2071-1050, 13 (2), 641 (2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13020641
[22] L. GRANDA, P. J. MOYA-FERNÁNDEZ, R. M. SORIANO-MIRAS, F. GONZÁLEZ-GÓMEZ: Pro-environmental behaviour in household water use: A gender perspective. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag., ISSN 2363-5031, 10 (2) (2024). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40899-023-01027-6
[23] C. SHU, F. XU, N. XIANG: Research on determinants of urban residential electricity conservation behaviors based on intervention experiment – the evidence from household survey of 4 megacities in China. In: Proc. of the 2020 Int. Conf. on Resource Sustainability: Sustainable Urbanisation in the BRI Era (icRS Urbanisation 2020), Springer Singapore, Singapore, 205–215 (2020).
[24] Y. MA, M. A. KOONDHAR, S. LIU, H. WANG, R. KONG: Perceived value influencing the household waste sorting behaviors in rural China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, ISSN 1661-7827, 17 (17), 6093 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176093
[25] Ö. H. ARAL, J. LÓPEZ-SINTAS: Is pro-environmentalism a privilege? Country development factors as moderators of socio-psychological drivers of pro-environmental behavior. Environ. Sociol., ISSN 2325-1042, 8 (2), 211–227 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2021.2018123
[26] E. E. O. OPOKU, K. E. DOGAH, O. A. ALUKO: The contribution of human development towards environmental sustainability. Energy Econ., ISSN 0140-9883, 106, 105782 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105782
[27] I. PISANO, M. LUBELL: Environmental behavior in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of 30 countries. Environ. Behav., ISSN 0013-9165, 49 (1), 31–58 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916515600494
[28] S. DU, G. CAO, Y. HUANG: The effect of income satisfaction on the relationship between income class and pro-environment behavior. Appl. Econ. Lett., ISSN 1350-4851, 31 (1), 61–64 (2024). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2125491
[29] P. BOURDIEU: The forms of capital. In: J. G. RICHARDSON (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood Press, 241–258 (1986).
[30] P. BOURDIEU: Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, translated by R. NICE, Harvard University Press (1984).
[31] R. GIFFORD, A. NILSSON: Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. Int. J. Psychol., ISSN 0020-7594, (2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
[32] L. STEG, C. VLEK: Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. J. Environ. Psychol., ISSN 0272-4944, 29 (3), 309–317 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
[33] S. BARR, A. GILG: Sustainable lifestyles: Framing environmental action in and around the home. Geoforum, ISSN 0016-7185, 37 (6), 906–920 (2006). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.05.002
[34] T. DIETZ, P. C. STERN, G. A. GUAGNANO: Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environ. Behav., ISSN 0013-9165, 30 (4), 450–471 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000402
[35] D. AMBASZ, A. GUPTA, H. A. PATRINOS: A review of human development and environmental outcomes. Policy Res. Work. Pap. 10438, The World Bank (2023).
[36] P. C. STERN, T. DIETZ, T. ABEL, G. A. GUAGNANO, L. KALOF: A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Hum. Ecol. Rev., ISSN 1074-4827, 6, 81–97 (1999).
[37] I. AJZEN: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., ISSN 0749-5978, 50 (2), 179–211 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t