The Role of TV Reality Show in Contributing to Changes in People's Behaviour: A Phenomenological Approach
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research is intended to dig deeper into what types of reality shows are currently being broadcast on television in Indonesia and how TV reality shows contribute to changes in people's behaviour. This study uses a qualitative methodology with a phenomenological approach. For data collection, a semi-structured interview and observation are employed. Interviews were conducted with housewives who felt the changes in their children's attitudes and behaviour after watching reality shows on television. Interviews were also conducted with teachers, psychologists and TV reality show producers. The results of this study proved that reality shows on Indonesian television make a major contribution to changing a person's behaviour. This behavioural change can be positive or negative. Therefore, these reality shows require tighter control by the government through the Ministry of Communication and Information and Indonesia Broadcasting Commission (KPI).
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Ardianto, E.L. (2004). Komunikasi Massa: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Simbiosa. Rekatama Media. hal 128.
Kuswandi, Wawan. (1998). Komunikasi Massa Sebuah Analisis Media Televisi. Jakarta: Rhineka Cipta.
Munthe, MG. 1996. Media Komunikasi Radio. Pustaka Sinar Harapan. Jakarta: Naratama. Nimas, A, P, (2012). Pengaruh Reality Show “Jalan Dakwah Episode Indungan Alam” Di Trans7 Terhadap Akhlak Remaja Di Desa Kebaron Kecamatan Tulungan Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Skripsi: Istitut Agama Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya Fakultas Dakwak Jurusan Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam.
Purwanti, Dwi. (2015). Dampak Media Televisi Pada Perilaku Negatif Remaja :Studi Kasus Desa Gladasari Kecamatan Ampel Kabupaten Boyolali. Skripsi. Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. hal. 5.
Priyowidodo, Gatut. (2008). Menakar Kekuatan dan Keunggulan Industri Televisi Lokal di Era Otonomi. Scriptura Vol 2, No 1 (2008): January. hal. 56-62. Institute of Research and Community Outreach - Petra Christian University
Farah Agustina Isfandiari. (2008). Faktor-faktor yang berhubungan dengan interpretasi khalayak remaja tentang realitas program reality show. Skripsi. FISIP UI. Program Sarjana Reguler. Departemen Ilmu Komunikasi.
Bancin, Imelda. (2009). Motivasi Konsumsi Terhadap Tayangan Reality Show Dan Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Informasinya, Jurnal: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik Departemen Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan.
Hill,Annette.(2005). RealityTV – Audiences and Popular Factual TV. Abingdon/New York: Routledge. 231 pp.
Nimas A.L. (2015). Pengaruh Reality Show “Jalan Dakwah Episode Lindungan Alam” Di Trans7 Terhadap Ahklak Remaja. Jurnal : Institut Agama Islam Negri Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
Morisan. (2008). Jurnalistik Televisi Mutakhir . Jakarta: Kencana. hal. 228.
Halik, Abdul, Dr. (2013). Komunikasi Massa. Cetakan I : Desember.ISBN. Makassar: Alauddin University Press. hal 129.
Ardianto, Elvinaro dkk. (2009). Komunikasi Massa : Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Simbiosa Rekatama Media. hal 66.
Kriyantono, Rahmat. (2006). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta : PT. Kencana Perdana.hal 285.
Mansur, Awadi, Dr. (1993). Manfaat Dan Mudarat Televisi, Jakarta: Fikahati Anska. hal 28.
Haspramudilla Dara (2009). Pengaruh terpaan tayangan reka ulang Adegan Kasus Kejahatan terhadap Persepsi Khalayak tentang realitas Kasus Kejahatan : Uji Perbedaan Persepsi Khalayak Umum dan Narapidana terhadap Realitas Kasus Kejahatan dalam Tayangan “Fakta”. Skripsi. Universitas Indonesia. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik. Program Studi Jurnalistik Media Siar.
Jennings Bryant and Susan Thomson. (2002). Fundamentals of media effects. Boston, Mass : McGraw-Hill, ©2002.
Windahl Sven, Signitzer Benno.H and Olson Jean T.(1992). Using communication theory:An introduction to planned communication, London: Sage Publications, 1992, 256 pp.
Mohamad Surya. (2010). Psikologi Guru: Konsep dan Aplikasi. Dari Guru Untuk Guru. Alfabeta. ISBN: 9786022890772.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA SAGE.
Maxwell ( 2013). Qualitative Research Design : An Interactive Approach (Third ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Van Manen. M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action Sensitive pedagogy. New York: The State University of New York Press.p. 177.
Jasper. (1994). Issues in phenomenology for researchers of nursing. PubMed Gov, NCBI, J.Adv.Nurs 1994, Feb 19 (2) , 309-4.
Omery.(1983). Phenomenology: a method for nursing research. PMID: 6401974; [Indexed for MEDLINE]. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1983 Jan;5(2):49-63.
Wimpenny,P. and Gass. J (2000). Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: Is there a difference? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(6), 1485–1492.
Sorrell, J.M, & Redmond, G.M (1995). Interviews in Qualitative nursing research: differing approaches for ethnographic and phenomenological studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing 21, 117-122.
Streubert, H., & Carpenter, D. (1999). Qualitative Research in Nursing: Advancing the Humanistic Perspective (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.p.48.
Sugiyono. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Spradley, James P. (1997). Metode Etnografi. Yogyakarta : Tiara Wacana Yogya.
Salim,Agus.( 2006). Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial. Yogyakarta: Tiara. Wacana.
Kriyantono, Rachmat.(2008). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.