The Perception of Learners on the Role of Facebook Messenger as a Tool for Academic Communication

Authors

  • Lavyrl Manriquez Kyle Angelo Learning Center Inc., Kawayan, Biliran, Philippines
  • Ruffy Mae G. Roque Villacaneja Elementary School, Naval, Biliran, Philippines
  • Michelle P. Serat Tabango, Leyte, Philippines
  • Gregg O. Siat Biliran Province State University, Naval, Biliran, Philippines https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6795-1726

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v67i1.12118

Keywords:

Facebook Messenger, Academic Communication, Educational Technology, Online Communication Tools, Learrner Perception, Social Media in Education

Abstract

This study explored how learners perceive Facebook Messenger as an academic communication tool and how it relates to demographic profiles in terms of age, gender, family income, and occupations concerning both parents. Using frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, and correlation tests, this study surveyed 39 respondents aged 9–13, where the largest number fell within the ages of 10 and 11. Results indicated that students find Messenger easy to use and accessible, helpful in academic engagement, and rated as "Very Good" to "Excellent" in most aspects. However, among the limitations of this app, its message handling and distractions were claimed. Most of the demographic variables were not significantly associated with their views except by mother's occupation and gender influencing specific categories. All these findings emphasize Messenger as a prospective reliable academic tool, emphasizing areas of improvement to exploit its potential in educational communication.
Keywords: Messenger, Academic Communication, Learner’s Perception, Educational Technology, Communication Platforms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-08

How to Cite

Manriquez, L., Roque, R. M., Serat, M., & Siat, G. (2025). The Perception of Learners on the Role of Facebook Messenger as a Tool for Academic Communication. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 67(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v67i1.12118